Turns out it really was all over except the shouting, as I watch the State of the Union and see newly-minted Justice Alito sitting in the front row.
Was it really worth it?
The tactics of delay, delay, delay went over about as well as a led balloon, considering the qualifications were never in question. Ideology, yes, but qualifications as to be an unbiased jurist? No doubt.
Negative press was bad enough BEFORE the filibuster announcement (when confirmation was already locked up) and got worse afterward before getting shot down.
So what did Democrats gain?
- They delayed Alito's nomination long enough so that it's another feather in Bush's cap as he gives the address.
- Filibusters may be off the table should another nominee come down the pike before 2008.
- Forcing some Democratic senators up for re-election to vote on a cloture motion may make them vulnerable in November (such as Menendez in NJ)
- The party now appears to be split to most casual viewers which can result in a stay-at-home approach in November if it truly appears to them that they are not a better alternative, also possibly leading to some GOP pickups (or retention of seats that should be lost, i.e. Conrad Burns)
- The margin of victory in a cloture vote may allow for another SCOTUS nominee (if one happens) to be more ideological than Justice Alito (whether that is bad or good is up to personal opinion) and have a good chance of getting through. Not good considering the odds are long that all of the more liberal justices may stay on the Court until 2009.
Wait, I'm sure I'll come up with something they gained.......um......there's gotta be something....